The goal of this lecture is to improve diagnosis and treatment of muscle disease. After hearing and assimilating this lecture, the clinician will be better able to:
Limb-girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMDs): Complex group of genetic and dystrophic disorders of muscle characterized by proximal weakness in shoulders and hips; inheritance either autosomal dominant (LGMD type 1) or autosomal recessive (LGMD type 2); despite their similarities, dystrophinopathies not considered subcategory of LGMDs; LGMDs found in 1 to 6 per 100,000 persons.
Diagnosis of LGMD: Approach to diagnosis changing; traditional approach — evaluation based on clinical phenotype; clinician characterized distribution and pattern of weakness, then sought associated features such as cardiac involvement, prominent contractures, scapular winging, or weakness of finger flexors or knee extensors; EMG assesses pattern of severe muscular involvement; muscle biopsy usually performed, which may demonstrate prominent necrosis, proliferation of connective tissue, inflammation, or vacuoles; biopsy and electrodiagnostic findings combined with clinical picture and degree of elevation of CK to diagnose type of LGMD; advent of molecular genetic testing has allowed clinicians to use all of this information to test for gene most likely to be involved; for example, in patient with autosomal dominant disorder, prominent contractures, and cardiac involvement, testing for mutation in gene for lamin A/C indicated.
Genetic testing: In last 3 to 5 years, diagnostic methods have evolved toward “inverted paradigm” approach; patients with pattern of weakness suggesting LGMD now often assessed initially with genetic panels in lieu of biopsy; panel may test for 40 to 60 genetic disorders of muscle; some companies offer limb-girdle panels; such testing may identify multiple variations in genes, many of which not associated with patient’s disease; for example, titin gene large, and 95% of individuals have nonpathogenic variations in this gene; report may identify several variations of questionable relevance (may not truly be associated with disease); in such cases, clinician may need to order biopsy, electrodiagnostic studies, and cardiac testing to try to identify other abnormalities and determine whether genetic findings pathogenic; merits of each approach (traditional versus inverted paradigm) debated.
Misdiagnosis: Every form of LGMD presents with proximal weakness, elevated CK, and myopathic EMG; patients frequently misdiagnosed with polymyositis; although patients with LGMD often believe disorder had recent onset, careful exploration of history may reveal that weakness began years earlier; most patients with LGMD display restricted pattern of weakness on physical examination; for example, extensors of knee may be weak while ankle dorsiflexors and flexors of knee normal; in contrast, inflammatory muscle diseases associated with more diffuse pattern of weakness; discrepancy in strength of neighboring muscles should prompt consideration of LGMD; contractures and cardiac manifestations also suggest LGMD; recessive diseases more common than dominant diseases.
Management of LGMDs: No treatment available for most patients with LGMD; however, as with some dystrophinopathies (eg, Duchenne muscular dystrophy), specific LGMD disorders respond to prednisone or other immunosuppressants; examples include LGMD2B (dysferlin deficiency) and LGMD2I (fukutin-related protein [FKRP] deficiency); clinician should consider trial of prednisone while monitoring side effects closely; otherwise, treatment mainly supportive; type of LGMD should be identified and cardiac or pulmonary status should be monitored; many patients require bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) at night; insidious respiratory involvement often missed; bracing, wheelchairs, and other supportive care provided as needed.
Dystrophinopathies: Although dystrophinopathies X-linked LGMDs, these diseases historically categorized separately from LGMD; with typical X-linked inheritance, women carry gene but only sons manifest disease; however, “manifesting carriers” of dystrophinopathies may develop elevated CK, proximal weakness, and cardiac involvement, especially as they age (leading to erroneous impression of dominant disorder); laboratory testing — 65% to 70% of Duchenne and Becker dystrophies caused by deletions or duplications in dystrophin gene; 25% to 30% caused by point mutations or intronic mutations not detected on initial screening for deletions or duplications; some panels test for point mutations but not for deletions or duplications; therefore, choice of laboratory important; Duchenne and Becker dystrophies more common than most types of LGMD; dystrophin gene testing often performed first in young boys, especially if CK high.
Clinical features of dystrophinopathies: Becker dystrophy milder than Duchenne dystrophy; most patients with Duchenne dystrophy have out-of-frame mutation that disrupts reading frame of mRNA; such patients have no detectable dystrophin; those with Becker dystrophy usually have in-frame deletions so that reading frame preserved; these patients may have reduced amount of dystrophin, or dystrophin may be reduced in size or partially nonfunctional; patients with Duchenne dystrophy present with proximal weakness, often with enlarged calves; falling observed at 3 to 5 years of age; disease usually rapidly progressive, and child needs wheelchair by 9 to 12 years of age; Becker dystrophy milder, can present in adulthood, and involves heart; pulmonary involvement usually severe in Duchenne dystrophy and correlates well with degree of peripheral weakness; in Becker dystrophy, pulmonary involvement may be mild or severe; children with Duchenne dystrophy require frequent cardiac echocardiography and pulmonary function testing; most patients need BPAP, and many children with Duchenne dystrophy need tracheostomy and full ventilatory support.
Diagnosis of dystrophinopathies: Onset of Duchenne dystrophy typically at 2 to 5 years of age; children begin to trip and fall and develop classic Gower sign (inability to rise from floor without pushing with hands, and using hands to “walk up” legs); CK usually markedly elevated (>10,000 U/L); when these findings present, genetic testing indicated and muscle biopsy unnecessary.
Management of dystrophinopathies: Similar to that of LGMD but corticosteroids (including prednisone and deflazacort) beneficial; steroids prolong ambulation by 3 to 5 years and benefit cardiac and pulmonary function, activities of daily living, and quality of life; steroids should be introduced when child starts to fall frequently; dose of prednisone 0.75 mg/kg/d; deflazacort has fewer side effects but not yet available in United States; dosing similar to that for prednisone; alternative dosing regimens have been tried, including 5 mg/kg/d on weekends only, or alternating 10 days on and 10 days off steroids; no formal studies conducted on use of steroids for Becker dystrophy, but this treatment reasonable to consider.
Iyadurai SJP, Kissel JT. The limb-girdle muscular dystrophies and the dystrophinopathies. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2016;22(6 Muscle and Neuromuscular Junction Disorders).
For this program, the following was disclosed: Dr. Kissel has received personal compensation for serving on a consulting board of AveXis, Inc, as journal editor of Muscle & Nerve, and as a consultant for Novartis AG. Dr. Kissel has received research/grant funding as principal investigator of a study from the National Institutes of Health and has received funding for clinical trials from AveXis, Inc; AxelaCare Health Solutions, LLC; BioMarin; CSL Behring; Cytokinetics, Inc; Ionis Pharmaceuticals; and Quintiles, Inc; and receives publishing royalties from Oxford University Press. Unlabeled Use of Products/Investigational Use Disclosure: Dr. Kissel discusses the unlabeled/investigational use of corticosteroids to treat Duchenne muscular dystrophy. To view disclosures of planning committee members with relevant financial relationships, visit: audiodigest.org/continuumaudio/committee. All other members of the planning committee report nothing to disclose.
The Audio- Digest Foundation is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The Audio- Digest Foundation designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Audio Digest Foundation is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's (ANCC's) Commission on Accreditation. Audio Digest Foundation designates this activity for 0 CE contact hours.
CA052203
This CME course qualifies for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™ for 3 years from the date of publication.
To earn CME/CE credit for this course, you must complete all the following components in the order recommended: (1) Review introductory course content, including Educational Objectives and Faculty/Planner Disclosures; (2) Listen to the audio program and review accompanying learning materials; (3) Complete posttest (only after completing Step 2) and earn a passing score of at least 80%. Taking the course Pretest and completing the Evaluation Survey are strongly recommended (but not mandatory) components of completing this CME/CE course.
Approximately 2x the length of the recorded lecture to account for time spent studying accompanying learning materials and completing tests.
More Details - Certification & Accreditation