The goal of this program is to improve the detection of substance use trends. After hearing and assimilating this program, the clinician will be better able to:
Teen substance use: the top 3 leading causes of death among adolescents in the United States (US) are motor vehicle accidents (MVAs), suicide, and homicide; alcohol and other substances are involved in a sizable proportion of these events
Alcohol: there has been an overall steady decline in binge drinking among teens, with less decline in female and Black adolescents, and adolescents from low socioeconomic backgrounds; fatal alcohol-related MVAs — have decreased overall but remain steady in those aged 16 to 17 yr; rates increase dramatically in age groups 18 to 20 yr and 21 to 30 yr; the majority of alcohol-related MVAs occur during late hours on weekends; risk — introduction to recreational alcohol use at younger ages is associated with a higher risk of developing an alcohol use disorder; family history of substance use disorder (SUD) also increases risk for substance abuse; delaying alcohol use until age 18 to 21 yr lowers the risk for substance use
Cannabis
Overview: has been legalized for recreational and medical use in many states and only for medical use in others; in some states, specific forms of cannabis have been legalized, including cannabis products that are higher in cannabidiol (a nonpsychoactive component that has pain- and anxiety-reducing properties) and lower in tetrahydrocannabinol (THC; a principal psychoactive component that produces a feeling of euphoria); some states have no policies surrounding cannabis, ie, it is not legalized for any use; in some states, cannabis is decriminalized; there seems to be a decline in the perceived risk of regular use of marijuana; the amount of students who report daily intake of cannabis has increased; 6.5% of high school seniors report using cannabis daily in the previous month
Health risks of cannabis use: must be communicated to students through counseling; driving under the influence of cannabis is not as risky as alcohol but still doubles the odds of an MVA; there are no cardiovascular or lung effects from cannabis use among youths; effects on male sexual function include potentially decreased levels of testosterone and sperm counts; there is a clear link with gastrointestinal function, eg, hyperemesis and changes in appetite as a result of heavy cannabis use or withdrawal; numerous studies show a possible association with alterations in brain structure and function; some studies demonstrate poorer intelligence quotient attainment among individuals who used cannabis heavily as adolescents; many emerging studies show links with depression, anxiety, and acute and chronic psychosis and schizophrenia following heavy use during adolescence; these do not occur in most adolescents who use cannabis, but there is some link
Effect of changing policies on cannabis use: Kann et al — surveyed ninth to twelfth graders in all 50 states of the US between 1993 and 2017 (Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance); showed that medical cannabis use laws are not associated with changes in past-30-day use or frequent use; recreational use laws are associated with a decrease in odds of cannabis, contrary to expectations; study by Plunk et al — involved 38 states; showed decline in mean arrest rates for cannabis possession over 3 yr in states with recreational use or decriminalization laws; states without policy changes had slight increases in adult arrests and slight decreases in youth arrests
Methods of cannabis consumption: the means by which cannabis products are consumed has changed; more young people are using vaporizable cannabis concentrates, eg, “shatter,” oil, wash, and butane hash; dabbing — involves heating a small amount of concentrated cannabis product to a high temperature and vaporizing it; the vaporized product is inhaled and delivers an enormously high amount of THC; associated with adverse health outcomes, particularly risk for psychosis; these new delivery methods are exposing young people to cannabis levels much higher than was achieved in the past
Electronic Cigarettes (ECs) and Vaping
Overview: data from the National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS) demonstrate that use of traditional tobacco products has declined in recent years, especially in 2011 to 2019; however, rates of EC (eg, JUUL) use have increased in recent years; JUUL devices became popular among young individuals in 2017; >25% of young persons report using an EC in the past 30 day; easy concealability of JUUL and other smaller devices contributes to popularity among youths
Central worry for teens: opposite to concerns of adult public health and harm reduction advocates; adults can use ECs to wean off cigarettes by decreasing nicotine levels and eventually reaching a state of abstinence, whereas EC use among teens may serve as a gateway toward traditional combustible cigarettes in the future; observational data validate this concern; recent meta-analytic data suggest that young people who use ECs are more likely to progress to traditional cigarette use; 2017 meta-analysis (Soneiji et al) — odds ratio was >3.5 with significant confidence intervals for transitioning to traditional cigarette use among young people who use ECs; 2018 NYTS — included >38,000 young persons; reported that history of vaping THC was 3% in children aged 9 to 12 yr, 11% in ages 13 to 15 yr, 24% in ages 16 to 17 yr, and 28% in ages ≥18 yr; the percentage of youth who had ever vaped THC was 6% among middle school students, 22% among high school students, 43% among youth who had ever tried any kind of vaping, 30% among youth with family members who vape, and 18% among youth with family members who had used any kind of tobacco product; risk is higher in families with history of nicotine use disorder
E-cigarette or vaping use-associated lung injury (EVALI): as of February 2020, there have been ≈2800 lung injury cases across 50 states and 68 confirmed deaths in 29 states; most individuals reported a history of vaping THC; vitamin E is frequently used to cut THC products, particularly those sold illicitly, and seems to be the cause in many cases; among patients who develop severe EVALI, 80% are aged <35 yr and >33% are aged <21 yr
Opioids
Trends in opioid overdose deaths: between 1999 and 2016, overdose deaths among youths aged 15 to 19 yr increased by 95% for prescription opioids, 405% for heroin, and 2925% for synthetic opioids (eg, fentanyl); fentanyl — contamination is now implicated in the majority of opioid-involved deaths; highly potent (50-100 times more potent than heroin); typically not prescribed but illicitly manufactured overseas and smuggled into the US; youth overdose on opioids combined with other substances (eg, cocaine, methamphetamines, benzodiazepines) became more common in 2017, indicating a polysubstance overdose crisis; ≈67% of individuals on opioid addiction treatment report first use at age <25 yr, and ≈33% report first use at age <18 yr; past-year use of nonheroin narcotics show a decline in recent years, but ≈3.5% of students report recreational use or misuse of prescription opioids for nonmedical purposes in the past year
Treatment: medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration include buprenorphine, naltrexone, and methadone; randomized clinical trials show fewer relapses and cravings for opioids, and longer retention in addiction treatment; medications should be combined with behavioral therapy; national data show that only 11% of youth who need treatment receive evidence-based treatment and only 3% of these individuals receive evidence-based medication
Screening to Brief Intervention (S2BI): includes questions about alcohol, cannabis, and tobacco use in the past year; if all answers are negative, questionnaire can be stopped; if positive, ask about other substances, including prescription and illegal drugs, inhalants, herbs, and synthetic drugs; proceed to CRAFFT questionnaire; frequency of use in the past year strongly correlates with risk for SUD; CRAFFT questions identify the types of problems one has; having more affirmative answers increases the likelihood of having SUD; one affirmative answer indicates a 33% chance of having SUD; 2 affirmative answers indicates a 67% chance of having SUD; brief intervention — brief recommendation to not use; finding an appropriate hook for that person is helpful; illustrate how reduction of use can help the patient attain personal goals; some youth need more extensive treatment and require referral; the clinician should become familiar with local treatment programs for substance use; the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration website can be useful for finding local treatment options; telemedicine is a viable option
Anderson DM, Hansen B, Rees DI, et al. Association of marijuana laws with teen marijuana use: New estimates from the youth risk behavior surveys. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(9):879-881. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1720; Blount BC, Karwowski MP, Shields PG, et al. Vitamin E acetate in bronchoalveolar-lavage fluid associated with EVALI. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(8):697-705; Dai H. Self-reported marijuana use in electronic cigarettes among US youth, 2017 to 2018. JAMA. 2020; 323(5):473-474; Gaither JR, Shabanova V, Leventhal JM. US national trends in pediatric deaths from prescription and illicit opioids, 1999-2016. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(8):e186558. Published 2018 Dec 7. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6558; Hadland SE, Xuan Z, Sarda V, et al. Alcohol policies and alcohol-related motor vehicle crash fatalities among young people in the US. Pediatrics. 2017; 139(3):e20163037; Hall W, Degenhardt L. Adverse health effects of non-medical cannabis use. Lancet. 2009;374(9698):1383-1391. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61037-0; Jiloha RC. Prevention, early intervention, and harm reduction of substance use in adolescents. Indian J Psychiatry. 2017;59(1):111-118. doi:10.4103/0019-5545.204444; Kann L, McManus T, Harris WA, et al. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance — United States, 2017. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018;67(No. SS-8):1–114. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6708a1external icon; Karila L, Roux P, Rolland B, et al. Acute and long-term effects of cannabis use: a review. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(25):4112-4118. doi:10.2174/13816128113199990620; King BA, Jones CM, Baldwin GT, et al. The EVALI and youth vaping epidemics — implications for public health. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382:689-691; Levy S, Weiss R, Sherritt L, et al. An electronic screen for triaging adolescent substance use by risk levels. JAMA Pediatr. 2014; 168(9):822-8; Lim JK, Earlywine JJ, Bagley SM, et al. Polysubstance involvement in opioid overdose deaths in adolescents and young adults, 1999-2018. JAMA Pediatr. 2021; 175(2):194-196; Mitchell SG, Kelly SM, Gryczynski J, et al. The CRAFFT cut-points and DSM-5 criteria for alcohol and other drugs: A re-evaluation and re-examination. Subst Abus. 2014; 35(4), 376–80; Plunk AD, Peglow SL, Harrell PT, et al. Youth and adult arrests for cannabis possession after decriminalization and legalization of cannabis. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(8):763-769. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1539; Soneiji S, Barrington-Trimis JL, Wills TA, et al. Association between initial use of e-cigarettes and subsequent cigarette smoking among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2017; 171(8):788-97.
For this program, members of the faculty and planning committee reported nothing relevant to disclose.
Dr. Hadland was recorded at the 36th Annual Pediatrics for the Practitioner: Update 2021, held virtually October 28-29, 2021, and presented by The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Division of General Pediatrics, and Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine; Johns Hopkins Children's Center; and the American Academy of Pediatrics, Maryland Chapter. For information about upcoming CME activities from this presenter, please visit https://hopkinscme.cloud-cme.com. Audio Digest thanks the speakers and presenters for their cooperation in the production of this program.
The Audio- Digest Foundation is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The Audio- Digest Foundation designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Audio Digest Foundation is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's (ANCC's) Commission on Accreditation. Audio Digest Foundation designates this activity for 0 CE contact hours.
PD681501
This CME course qualifies for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™ for 3 years from the date of publication.
To earn CME/CE credit for this course, you must complete all the following components in the order recommended: (1) Review introductory course content, including Educational Objectives and Faculty/Planner Disclosures; (2) Listen to the audio program and review accompanying learning materials; (3) Complete posttest (only after completing Step 2) and earn a passing score of at least 80%. Taking the course Pretest and completing the Evaluation Survey are strongly recommended (but not mandatory) components of completing this CME/CE course.
Approximately 2x the length of the recorded lecture to account for time spent studying accompanying learning materials and completing tests.
More Details - Certification & Accreditation