The goal of this program is to improve diagnosis of celiac disease. After hearing and assimilating this program, the clinician will be better able to:
Overview: Celiac disease (CeD, or sprue) is present in 1% of the US population; the classic presentation of celiac disease (including diarrhea and abdominal cramping) has been surpassed by dozens of nongastrointestinal (GI) manifestations; antibody and genetic tests are now available to help make the diagnosis; risk factors include first- and second-degree relatives with CeD and presence of type 1 diabetes mellitus or autoimmune thyroiditis
Whom to test: assess patients with diarrhea, malabsorption, weight loss, pain, and bloating for CeD; these symptoms are also present in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and a host of other GI illnesses
Nonceliac gluten sensitivity: represents a variety of poorly understood reactions to gluten or other food elements in patients not diagnosed with CeD; estimated prevalence is 0.55%
Differential diagnosis of CeD: includes lactose intolerance, IBS, hyperthyroidism, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), infections, and many other illnesses; diagnosis of CeD can take years because of the large differential diagnosis associated with diarrhea and abdominal pain
Gluten-free diets: consuming a gluten-free diet usually increases a person’s intake of fats and sugars; it also may be low in fiber, iron, folates, and B vitamins; most Americans with CeD are overweight; oats do not contain gluten (unless the product is produced in a factory that just processed wheat); ≤20% of patients with CeD do not have a full response to a gluten-free diet because of nonadherence, inadvertent ingestion of gluten, and difficulty in determining the true gluten status of foods when dining out; some patients with CeD do not respond at all; in addition to oats, individuals with CeD can consume rice, quinoa, and soy
Extraintestinal symptoms: neuropsychiatric issues (eg, depression, “brain fog,” anorexia nervosa, anxiety, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, schizophrenia), autoimmune disease, and elevated transaminases may be manifested in CeD; fever is not a manifestation; other nonclassic features include fatigue, short-term memory loss, irritability, and reduced bone density
Dermatitis herpetiformis: diagnostic for CeD; manifested by itchy blisters occurring on the extensor surfaces of the limbs, but may also appear elsewhere; ≈10% of patients with CeD have this condition (many do not have GI symptoms); skin biopsy can confirm diagnosis; resolving dermatitis herpetiformis with a gluten-free diet can take months, but treatment with dapsone offers immediate relief
Diagnostic tests: tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG-IgA) is the first-line serum test for CeD; it is 96% to 98% sensitive and 88% to 100% specific; the antigliadin antibody (AGA) test is no longer used because of inaccuracies; the antiendomysial antibody (EMA) test is a high-technology, high-cost test with 75% to 98% sensitivity and 99% to 100% specificity; it may be considered when tTG-IgA test results are questionable; false-positive tTG antibody tests are rare, but may occur in patients with IBD, connective tissue diseases, febrile illnesses, or type 1 diabetes
Total immunoglobulin A (IgA) test: the speaker recommends a total IgA test because 2% to 5% of patients with CeD may be IgA deficient; IgA deficiency is 10 to 15 times more common in individuals with CeD than in those without it; IgA deficiency is asymptomatic, and it requires special workup for CeD that includes an antideamidated gliadin peptide (anti-DGP) test, which is generally more accurate than tTG-IgA for evaluating CeD in IgA-deficient individuals; anti-EMA tests are often falsely negative in IgA-deficient individuals
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DQ2 and DQ8 haplotypes: carried by 35% to 40% of the US population; associated with autoimmune disease and type 1 diabetes; when assessing HLA DQ2 and DQ8, one is looking for negative results
Nonceliac gluten sensitivity: a series of poorly understood reactions to gluten, fructans, or another element that is not CeD; controversial topic because the pathophysiology is not established; 45% of patients with self-reported wheat sensitivity actually have IBS
Distinguishing nonceliac gluten sensitivity from IBS: exclude celiac disease; instruct patient to follow a gluten-free diet for ≥6 wk; waxing and waning symptoms usually indicate IBS; symptoms that are mostly well-controlled suggest nonceliac gluten sensitivity
Nutritional deficiencies in CeD: iron deficiency anemia can occur in 33% of men and 19% of women with CeD; folate deficiency can occur in 12%, and B12 deficiency in 5%; the duodenum and upper jejunum absorb iron and folate, and the ileum absorbs vitamin B12; the proximal small bowel is the area most commonly affected by CeD
Addressing patients’ questions: in speaker’s experience, it is exceedingly rare for filler in pills or capsules to exacerbate CeD; IBS and CeD can coexist; CeD and microscopic colitis can coexist (≤33% of patients with CeD have findings suggestive of microscopic colitis); this is especially important if patient remains symptomatic after truly adhering to a gluten-free die; investigate further with colonoscopy and biopsy; duodenal biopsies are not useful for patients on self-imposed gluten-free diets because the villi will have regenerated
Treatment: currently, the only way to manage CeD is to consume a gluten-free diet; peptide vaccinations and enzymes may be part of future therapeutics
Considerations and scenarios: CeD in the presence of negative tTG-IgA is possible but very unlikely; false-negative results may occur with mild disease; IBS is more likely; small-bowel biopsy — modified Marsh classification system is used to evaluate histologic components beyond villi appearance; type 0 is normal (CeD highly unlikely); type 1 has a large differential diagnosis, including CeD; type 2 is very rare; may include CeD with dermatitis herpetiformis; type 3 indicates symptomatic CeD; per American College of Gastroenterology guidelines (2019), all tTG-IgA-positive patients with suspected CeD require a small-bowel biopsy; guidelines state that a high level of transglutaminase antibodies, >10 times the upper limit of normal, is a reliable and accurate test for diagnosing active celiac disease; when such a strongly positive transglutaminase antibody is combined with a positive endomysial antibody in a second blood sample, the positive predictive value for CeD is virtually 100%; can be caused by many other conditions (eg, SIBO, malnutrition, autoimmune enteropathy, giardia, Crohn disease, HIV, tuberculosis); in pediatric patients, biopsies are considered optional under certain circumstances; more scenarios — a capsule endoscopy to assess CeD may be considered for extraordinary symptoms such as bleeding or severe pain; tTG-IgA testing may be considered to monitor diet compliance; a gluten rechallenge is not required for patients with a diagnosis of CeD; the US Preventive Services Task Force (2017) recommends against routine screening of asymptomatic family members; outdated AGA test — a patient with a positive AGA test from many years ago may or may not have CeD, as the original test was “notoriously inaccurate”; in such a patient, HLA (genetic) testing should be performed; if negative, the patient does not have and will never have CeD; if positive, gluten challenge for 12 mo with follow-up blood test would be appropriate
CeD and other diseases: lymphoma — patients with CeD have an increased risk for lymphoma (≈1 in 8000); CeD that is refractory to diet restrictions may indicate lymphoma or other malignancy; leaky gut — presence has been demonstrated in CeD and many other illnesses, but the clinical significance is not clear
Positive tTG-IGA test and negative small-bowel biopsy: in such a patient, the first question is how thorough the biopsy was; current approach to small-bowel biopsy calls for 2 biopsies from the duodenal bulb, which may detect very early disease and increases the yield of diagnosis by 13%; in addition, 4 biopsies should be performed in the second duodenum; false-positive tTG-IGA is rare; can use anti-EMA antibodies, anti-DGP, and genetics for diagnosis
Final considerations: nonresponse to gluten-free diet — patient may have microscopic colitis, IBS, or IBD; controlled type 1 diabetes with abdominal pain, bloating, and diarrhea — potential associated conditions include gastroparesis, diabetic bowel, SIBO, and CeD; conditions associated with CeD — include type 1 diabetes, elevated transaminases, Down syndrome, autoimmune thyroid diseases, and many others: genetically modified wheat — there is no definitive answer as to whether genetic modification is a source of increased CeD and nonceliac gluten sensitivity
Cabanillas B. Gluten-related disorders: Celiac disease, wheat allergy, and nonceliac gluten sensitivity. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020;60(15):2606-2621; Domsa EM et al. Celiac disease: A multi-faceted medical condition. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2020;71(1); Hujoel IA, Murray JA. Refractory celiac disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2020;22(4):18; Husby S et al. AGA clinical practice update on diagnosis and monitoring of celiac disease-changing utility of serology and histologic measures: expert review. Gastroenterology. 2019;156: 885–889; Lebwohl B et al. Epidemiology, presentation, and diagnosis of celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(1):63-75; Rostom A et al. The diagnostic accuracy of serologic tests for celiac disease: a systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:S38–46; Rubin JE et al. Celiac disease. Ann Intern Med. 2020;172(1):ITC1-ITC16; Serena G et al. Celiac disease and non-celiac wheat sensitivity: state of art of non-dietary therapies. Front Nutr. 2020;7:152.
For this program, members of the faculty and planning committee reported nothing to disclose. In his lecture, Dr. Buch presents information related to the off-label or investigational use of a therapy, product, or device.
Dr. Buch was recorded exclusively for Audio Digest using teleconference software in compliance with social-distancing guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Audio Digest thanks the speakers for their cooperation in the production of this program.
The Audio- Digest Foundation is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The Audio- Digest Foundation designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Audio Digest Foundation is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's (ANCC's) Commission on Accreditation. Audio Digest Foundation designates this activity for 0 CE contact hours.
GE350802
This CME course qualifies for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™ for 3 years from the date of publication.
To earn CME/CE credit for this course, you must complete all the following components in the order recommended: (1) Review introductory course content, including Educational Objectives and Faculty/Planner Disclosures; (2) Listen to the audio program and review accompanying learning materials; (3) Complete posttest (only after completing Step 2) and earn a passing score of at least 80%. Taking the course Pretest and completing the Evaluation Survey are strongly recommended (but not mandatory) components of completing this CME/CE course.
Approximately 2x the length of the recorded lecture to account for time spent studying accompanying learning materials and completing tests.
More Details - Certification & Accreditation